On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:42:57 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> > I'll let you know when these are finished.
> Thank you for testing.
Our short tests that were crashing have all now passed :-) with your
patches applied.
We are now running our full tier tests on the code, but I don't think
we need
Le 30/01/2014 14:31, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:43 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Steve, I think the patch I sent yesterday is the good fix. At the end, it's
a backport of Willem's patch. Note that he also ack that patch.
The first version you sent (which removes
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:43 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Steve, I think the patch I sent yesterday is the good fix. At the end, it's
> a backport of Willem's patch. Note that he also ack that patch.
> The first version you sent (which removes
> unregister_netdevice_queue(sitn->fb_tunnel_dev,
Le 29/01/2014 21:48, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:04:12 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Your patch serie seems to be the good way to go (note that patch 1/2 does not
compile) but I think the fix is smaller because we don't have x-netns.
Here is my proposal, if you agree, I
Le 29/01/2014 21:48, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:04:12 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
Your patch serie seems to be the good way to go (note that patch 1/2 does not
compile) but I think the fix is smaller because we don't have x-netns.
Here is my
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:43 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
Steve, I think the patch I sent yesterday is the good fix. At the end, it's
a backport of Willem's patch. Note that he also ack that patch.
The first version you sent (which removes
Le 30/01/2014 14:31, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:43 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
Steve, I think the patch I sent yesterday is the good fix. At the end, it's
a backport of Willem's patch. Note that he also ack that patch.
The first version you
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:42:57 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
I'll let you know when these are finished.
Thank you for testing.
Our short tests that were crashing have all now passed :-) with your
patches applied.
We are now running our full tier tests on the code, but
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:04:12 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Your patch serie seems to be the good way to go (note that patch 1/2 does not
> compile) but I think the fix is smaller because we don't have x-netns.
>
> Here is my proposal, if you agree, I will send the same patch for ip6_tunnnel,
> From d101450583c3a472a2a94904cfe13fd4e7d2f519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nicolas Dichtel
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:40:30 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] sit: fix double free of fb_tunnel_dev on exit
>
> This problem was fixed upstream by commit 9434266f2c64 ("sit: fix use after
> free
> of
Le 29/01/2014 13:57, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:04:05 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 28/01/2014 21:57, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
can
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:52:14 -0800 (PST)
David Miller wrote:
> Greg, these have my blessing, please apply these to 3.10 -stable,
> thanks a lot!
Hi David,
Thanks for the blessing :-) But I want to work with Nicolas a bit more
to make sure that I have a correct backport. Just because it fixed
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:04:05 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 28/01/2014 21:57, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
> > At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
> > stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
> > can hit with the vanilla 3.10.27 kernel
Le 28/01/2014 21:57, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
can hit with the vanilla 3.10.27 kernel (no -rt patches applied).
I sent out a bug fix that can cause a crash
Le 28/01/2014 21:57, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
can hit with the vanilla 3.10.27 kernel (no -rt patches applied).
I sent out a bug fix that can cause a crash
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:04:05 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
Le 28/01/2014 21:57, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
can hit with the
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:52:14 -0800 (PST)
David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
Greg, these have my blessing, please apply these to 3.10 -stable,
thanks a lot!
Hi David,
Thanks for the blessing :-) But I want to work with Nicolas a bit more
to make sure that I have a correct backport. Just
Le 29/01/2014 13:57, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:04:05 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
Le 28/01/2014 21:57, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
stress testing on that kernel. This has
From d101450583c3a472a2a94904cfe13fd4e7d2f519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dich...@6wind.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:40:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sit: fix double free of fb_tunnel_dev on exit
This problem was fixed upstream by commit 9434266f2c64 (sit: fix use
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:04:12 +0100
Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
Your patch serie seems to be the good way to go (note that patch 1/2 does not
compile) but I think the fix is smaller because we don't have x-netns.
Here is my proposal, if you agree, I will send the same
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:57:56 -0500
> At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
> stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
> can hit with the vanilla 3.10.27 kernel (no -rt patches applied).
>
> I sent out a bug fix
At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
can hit with the vanilla 3.10.27 kernel (no -rt patches applied).
I sent out a bug fix that can cause a crash with the current 3.10.27
when you add and then
At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
can hit with the vanilla 3.10.27 kernel (no -rt patches applied).
I sent out a bug fix that can cause a crash with the current 3.10.27
when you add and then
From: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:57:56 -0500
At Red Hat we base our real-time kernel off of 3.10.27 and do lots of
stress testing on that kernel. This has discovered some bugs that we
can hit with the vanilla 3.10.27 kernel (no -rt patches applied).
I sent
24 matches
Mail list logo
