Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

2014-04-20 Thread Mel Gorman
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 04:48:25PM -0400, John Stoffel wrote: > > "Andrew" == Andrew Morton writes: > > Andrew> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: > >> Changelog since v1 > >> o topology comment updates > >> > >> When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

2014-04-20 Thread Mel Gorman
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 04:48:25PM -0400, John Stoffel wrote: Andrew == Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org writes: Andrew On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: Changelog since v1 o topology comment updates When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

2014-04-18 Thread John Stoffel
> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton writes: Andrew> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: >> Changelog since v1 >> o topology comment updates >> >> When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances >> punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

2014-04-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: > Changelog since v1 > o topology comment updates > > When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances > punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA > node. NUMA machines are now common but few

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

2014-04-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: Changelog since v1 o topology comment updates When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA node. NUMA machines are now common

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

2014-04-18 Thread John Stoffel
Andrew == Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org writes: Andrew On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: Changelog since v1 o topology comment updates When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances punished and workloads were generally

[PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

2014-04-08 Thread Mel Gorman
Changelog since v1 o topology comment updates When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA node. NUMA machines are now common but few of the workloads are NUMA-aware and it's routine to see major

[PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

2014-04-08 Thread Mel Gorman
Changelog since v1 o topology comment updates When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA node. NUMA machines are now common but few of the workloads are NUMA-aware and it's routine to see major