Re: [PATCH 0/2] Mempressure cgroup

2013-01-11 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:27:52 -0800 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > - I've split the pach into two: 'shrinker' and 'levels' parts. While the > full-fledged userland shrinker is an interesting idea, we don't have any > users ready for it, so I won't advocate for it too much. For the next version of

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Mempressure cgroup

2013-01-11 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:27:52 -0800 Anton Vorontsov anton.voront...@linaro.org wrote: - I've split the pach into two: 'shrinker' and 'levels' parts. While the full-fledged userland shrinker is an interesting idea, we don't have any users ready for it, so I won't advocate for it too much.

[PATCH 0/2] Mempressure cgroup

2013-01-04 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Hi all, Here is another round of the mempressure cgroup. This time I dared to remove the RFC tag. :) In this revision: - Addressed most of Kirill Shutemov's comments. I didn't bother implementing per-level lists, though. It would needlessly complicate the logic, and the gain would be only

[PATCH 0/2] Mempressure cgroup

2013-01-04 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Hi all, Here is another round of the mempressure cgroup. This time I dared to remove the RFC tag. :) In this revision: - Addressed most of Kirill Shutemov's comments. I didn't bother implementing per-level lists, though. It would needlessly complicate the logic, and the gain would be only