On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:52:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
Hi Guenter,
>
> it looks like there is another failure in linux-next, this time with
> sparc64:allmodconfig:
>
> WARNING: arch/sparc/kernel/built-in.o(__ex_table+0x3b4): Section mismatch in
> reference from the
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:52:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Quentin,
Hi Guenter,
it looks like there is another failure in linux-next, this time with
sparc64:allmodconfig:
WARNING: arch/sparc/kernel/built-in.o(__ex_table+0x3b4): Section mismatch in
reference from the (unknown
Hi Quentin,
it looks like there is another failure in linux-next, this time with
sparc64:allmodconfig:
WARNING: arch/sparc/kernel/built-in.o(__ex_table+0x3b4): Section mismatch in
reference from the (unknown reference) (unknown) to the variable :__retl_efault
/bin/sh: line 1: 22844 Floating
Hi Quentin,
it looks like there is another failure in linux-next, this time with
sparc64:allmodconfig:
WARNING: arch/sparc/kernel/built-in.o(__ex_table+0x3b4): Section mismatch in
reference from the (unknown reference) (unknown) to the variable :__retl_efault
/bin/sh: line 1: 22844 Floating
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 05:47:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 01:21 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:43:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> Let me know if you can find a score toolchain - otherwise I'll make a copy
> >> of mine available.
> >
> > I
On 04/16/2015 01:21 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:43:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
For
>From 2e9abac9cbde18af48951c54d52c9c515f9883a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quentin Casasnovas
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:39:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] modpost: do not try
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:43:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> For
>
> >From 2e9abac9cbde18af48951c54d52c9c515f9883a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Quentin Casasnovas
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:39:50 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] modpost: do not try to match the SHT_NUL section.
>
>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:43:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
For
From 2e9abac9cbde18af48951c54d52c9c515f9883a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quentin Casasnovas quentin.casasno...@oracle.com
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:39:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] modpost: do not try to match the SHT_NUL
On 04/16/2015 01:21 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:43:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
For
From 2e9abac9cbde18af48951c54d52c9c515f9883a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quentin Casasnovas quentin.casasno...@oracle.com
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:39:50 +0200
Subject:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 05:47:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/16/2015 01:21 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:43:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Let me know if you can find a score toolchain - otherwise I'll make a copy
of mine available.
I could not find
Guenter Roeck writes:
> >From 2e9abac9cbde18af48951c54d52c9c515f9883a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Quentin Casasnovas
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:39:50 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] modpost: do not try to match the SHT_NUL section.
>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck
Thanks Guenter, for all your
On 04/15/2015 02:19 PM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on score
and some other architectures. I've checked the new
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:19:56PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> > > The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on
> > > score
> > > and some other
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> > The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on score
> > and some other architectures. I've checked the new __ex_table checker
> > still works on x86-64
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:46:37PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> > >
> > > While I agree that those should get fixed (if they are real problems,
> > > especially the ones for parisc and mn10300), I don't think it is
> > > a
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:46:37PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> > >
> > > Let me know if this makes things better..
> > >
>
> Hi Guenter,
>
> >
> > the crash is fixed,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> >
> > Let me know if this makes things better..
> >
Hi Guenter,
>
> the crash is fixed, but now I get
>
That's a first step.. :)
> FATAL: The relocation at __ex_table+0x4
On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on score
and some other architectures. I've checked the new __ex_table checker
still works on x86-64 with them (it still detects an entry pointing to
.altinstr_rplacement) and
The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on score
and some other architectures. I've checked the new __ex_table checker
still works on x86-64 with them (it still detects an entry pointing to
.altinstr_rplacement) and they should apply cleanly on top of Rusty's
On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on score
and some other architectures. I've checked the new __ex_table checker
still works on x86-64 with them (it still detects an entry pointing to
.altinstr_rplacement) and
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
Let me know if this makes things better..
Hi Guenter,
the crash is fixed, but now I get
That's a first step.. :)
FATAL: The relocation at __ex_table+0x4 references
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:46:37PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
Let me know if this makes things better..
Hi Guenter,
the crash is fixed, but now I get
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:46:37PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
While I agree that those should get fixed (if they are real problems,
especially the ones for parisc and mn10300), I don't think it is
a good idea to
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:19:56PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on
score
and some other
On 04/15/2015 02:19 PM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on score
and some other architectures. I've checked the new
Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net writes:
From 2e9abac9cbde18af48951c54d52c9c515f9883a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quentin Casasnovas quentin.casasno...@oracle.com
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:39:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] modpost: do not try to match the SHT_NUL section.
Tested-by: Guenter
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:26:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/15/2015 01:54 AM, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on score
and some other architectures. I've checked the new __ex_table checker
still works on x86-64 with them
The following two patches might (hopefully) fix the build breakage on score
and some other architectures. I've checked the new __ex_table checker
still works on x86-64 with them (it still detects an entry pointing to
.altinstr_rplacement) and they should apply cleanly on top of Rusty's
28 matches
Mail list logo
