Re: [PATCH 0/2] Was: Convert process iteration to use for_each_process_thread()

2014-04-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:05:05 +0200 Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/09, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > The tasklist_lock is all that is needed. > > Yes, but not _irq. Plus this code is buggy ;) > > Steven, I sent these patches twice (at least!). This time I didn't > bother to recheck this code, but

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Was: Convert process iteration to use for_each_process_thread()

2014-04-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:05:05 +0200 Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/09, Steven Rostedt wrote: The tasklist_lock is all that is needed. Yes, but not _irq. Plus this code is buggy ;) Steven, I sent these patches twice (at least!). This time I didn't bother to recheck this code,

[PATCH 0/2] Was: Convert process iteration to use for_each_process_thread()

2014-04-09 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 04/09, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > The tasklist_lock is all that is needed. Yes, but not _irq. Plus this code is buggy ;) Steven, I sent these patches twice (at least!). This time I didn't bother to recheck this code, but the patches still apply so perhaps you can take a look? Last attempt, I

[PATCH 0/2] Was: Convert process iteration to use for_each_process_thread()

2014-04-09 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 04/09, Steven Rostedt wrote: The tasklist_lock is all that is needed. Yes, but not _irq. Plus this code is buggy ;) Steven, I sent these patches twice (at least!). This time I didn't bother to recheck this code, but the patches still apply so perhaps you can take a look? Last attempt, I