On 13/01/15 10:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Jiang,
>>
>> On 09/01/15 03:07, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> On 2015/1/9 1:32, Marc Zyngier wrote:
With the landing of stacked irq domains in 3.19, we have ended up in a
situation where we have a stack of IR
On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Jiang,
>
> On 09/01/15 03:07, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > On 2015/1/9 1:32, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> With the landing of stacked irq domains in 3.19, we have ended up in a
> >> situation where we have a stack of IRQ controllers, each with their
> >> set of fla
Hi Jiang,
On 09/01/15 03:07, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/1/9 1:32, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> With the landing of stacked irq domains in 3.19, we have ended up in a
>> situation where we have a stack of IRQ controllers, each with their
>> set of flags, but the core code is only able to look at the top-
On 2015/1/9 1:32, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> With the landing of stacked irq domains in 3.19, we have ended up in a
> situation where we have a stack of IRQ controllers, each with their
> set of flags, but the core code is only able to look at the top-most,
> which is not very helpful. This small series
With the landing of stacked irq domains in 3.19, we have ended up in a
situation where we have a stack of IRQ controllers, each with their
set of flags, but the core code is only able to look at the top-most,
which is not very helpful. This small series is trying to fix this.
The first patch conve
5 matches
Mail list logo