Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

2015-03-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:47:30 AM Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki > wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is > >>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

2015-03-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:47:30 AM Alexandre Courbot wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is

Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

2015-03-17 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is >> rather costly. > > Linus, Alexandre, any objections to this series? > > If not,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

2015-03-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is > rather costly. Linus, Alexandre, any objections to this series? If not, would there be any problem if I took these to my tree? I'll probably

Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

2015-03-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is rather costly. Linus, Alexandre, any objections to this series? If not, would there be any problem if I took these to my tree? I'll probably have

Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

2015-03-17 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is rather costly. Linus, Alexandre, any objections to this series? If

[PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

2015-03-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is rather costly. Kind regards, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

[PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

2015-03-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is rather costly. Kind regards, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at