Re: [PATCH 0/3] checkpatch: Add missing c90 types

2014-07-18 Thread Andy Whitcroft
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:52:00AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > c90 section "6.7.2 Type Specifiers" says: > "type specifiers may occur in any order" > > That means that: > short int is the same as int short > unsigned short int is the same as int unsigned short > etc... > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] checkpatch: Add missing c90 types

2014-07-18 Thread Andy Whitcroft
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:52:00AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: c90 section 6.7.2 Type Specifiers says: type specifiers may occur in any order That means that: short int is the same as int short unsigned short int is the same as int unsigned short etc... checkpatch

[PATCH 0/3] checkpatch: Add missing c90 types

2014-07-17 Thread Joe Perches
c90 section "6.7.2 Type Specifiers" says: "type specifiers may occur in any order" That means that: short int is the same as int short unsigned short int is the same as int unsigned short etc... checkpatch currently parses only a subset of these allowed types. For instance:

[PATCH 0/3] checkpatch: Add missing c90 types

2014-07-17 Thread Joe Perches
c90 section 6.7.2 Type Specifiers says: type specifiers may occur in any order That means that: short int is the same as int short unsigned short int is the same as int unsigned short etc... checkpatch currently parses only a subset of these allowed types. For instance: unsigned