On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 06:03:54PM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
> On Saturday 20 December 2014 08:16:54 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > > Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
> > > > > > Just to
On Sat 2014-12-20 18:02:49, Pali Rohár wrote:
> 2014-12-20 17:28 GMT+01:00 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh :
>
> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
> > > > > > Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
> > > > > >
On Saturday 20 December 2014 08:16:54 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
> > > > > Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
> > > > >
> > > > >
On December 20, 2014 8:28:04 AM PST, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > > > Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
>> > > > Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
>> > > >
>> > > >
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
> > > > Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
> > > >
> > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05922.ht
> > > > ml
> > > >
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
> > > > Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
> > > >
> > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05922.ht
> > > > ml
> > > >
Hi!
> > > Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
> > > Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
> > >
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05922.ht
> > > ml
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05924.h
> > > tml
> >
> > I
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 19:03:37 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:07:35PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 05 December 2014 21:41:22 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2014-12-05 21:31:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 19:03:37 Darren Hart wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:07:35PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 05 December 2014 21:41:22 Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2014-12-05 21:31:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On
Hi!
Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05922.ht
ml
http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05924.h
tml
I don't have any objection to
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05922.ht
ml
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05922.ht
ml
http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg05924.h
On December 20, 2014 8:28:04 AM PST, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@hmh.eng.br wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
On Saturday 20 December 2014 08:16:54 Darren Hart wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
On Sat 2014-12-20 18:02:49, Pali Rohár wrote:
2014-12-20 17:28 GMT+01:00 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
Just to remind that patch fixing problem described in
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 06:03:54PM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
On Saturday 20 December 2014 08:16:54 Darren Hart wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Ok, I agree that it is subjective how serious it is...
Just to remind that patch
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:07:35PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 05 December 2014 21:41:22 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2014-12-05 21:31:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele
> > > >
On Friday 05 December 2014 21:41:22 Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2014-12-05 21:31:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele
> > > Mazzotta
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > Currently dell-wmi reports
On Fri 2014-12-05 21:31:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta
> wrote:
> > > Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events that
> > > are notifications of changes performed by the
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta
wrote:
> > Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events that
> > are notifications of changes performed by the BIOS.
> > This patch series make sure that no keypresses
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta
wrote:
Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events that
are notifications of changes performed by the BIOS.
This patch series make sure that no keypresses are sent
On Fri 2014-12-05 21:31:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta
wrote:
Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events that
are notifications of changes performed by the BIOS.
On Friday 05 December 2014 21:41:22 Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2014-12-05 21:31:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele
Mazzotta
wrote:
Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:07:35PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 05 December 2014 21:41:22 Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2014-12-05 21:31:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 14:34:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele
Mazzotta
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
> Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events that are
> notifications of changes performed by the BIOS.
> This patch series make sure that no keypresses are sent for those
> events so that nothing is done from userspace.
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events that are
notifications of changes performed by the BIOS.
This patch series make sure that no keypresses are sent for those
events so that nothing is done from userspace.
Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events that are
notifications of changes performed by the BIOS.
This patch series make sure that no keypresses are sent for those
events so that nothing is done from userspace.
Gabriele Mazzotta (3):
dell-wmi: Use appropriate keycode for radio
Currently dell-wmi reports keypresses for WMI events that are
notifications of changes performed by the BIOS.
This patch series make sure that no keypresses are sent for those
events so that nothing is done from userspace.
Gabriele Mazzotta (3):
dell-wmi: Use appropriate keycode for radio
28 matches
Mail list logo