On 27 June 2016 at 19:39, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Despite positive testing across a number of machines and a number of
> people, last week I got a report that my 150 MHz series was breaking
> things on a handful of boards.
>
> It turns out that reverting the patch to
On 27 June 2016 at 19:39, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Despite positive testing across a number of machines and a number of
> people, last week I got a report that my 150 MHz series was breaking
> things on a handful of boards.
>
> It turns out that reverting the patch to always power cycle across
Despite positive testing across a number of machines and a number of
people, last week I got a report that my 150 MHz series was breaking
things on a handful of boards.
It turns out that reverting the patch to always power cycle across clock
changes fixes things and reverting that patch also
Despite positive testing across a number of machines and a number of
people, last week I got a report that my 150 MHz series was breaking
things on a handful of boards.
It turns out that reverting the patch to always power cycle across clock
changes fixes things and reverting that patch also
4 matches
Mail list logo