Re: [PATCH 0/3] staging: ramster: move to new zcache2 code base

2012-09-05 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:38:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:00:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:46:01PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > > Hi Greg -- > > > > > > gregkh> If you feel that the existing code needs to be dropped > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] staging: ramster: move to new zcache2 code base

2012-09-05 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:38:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:00:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:46:01PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: Hi Greg -- gregkh If you feel that the existing code needs to be dropped gregkh and

Re: [PATCH 0/3] staging: ramster: move to new zcache2 code base

2012-09-04 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:00:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:46:01PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > Hi Greg -- > > > > gregkh> If you feel that the existing code needs to be dropped > > gregkh> and replaced with a totally new version, that's fine with > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] staging: ramster: move to new zcache2 code base

2012-09-04 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:00:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:46:01PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: Hi Greg -- gregkh If you feel that the existing code needs to be dropped gregkh and replaced with a totally new version, that's fine with gregkh me.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] staging: ramster: move to new zcache2 code base

2012-08-30 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:46:01PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > Hi Greg -- > > gregkh> If you feel that the existing code needs to be dropped > gregkh> and replaced with a totally new version, that's fine with > gregkh> me. It's forward progress, which is all that I ask for. >

[PATCH 0/3] staging: ramster: move to new zcache2 code base

2012-08-30 Thread Dan Magenheimer
Hi Greg -- gregkh> If you feel that the existing code needs to be dropped gregkh> and replaced with a totally new version, that's fine with gregkh> me. It's forward progress, which is all that I ask for. (http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1208.0/02240.html, in reference to zcache,

[PATCH 0/3] staging: ramster: move to new zcache2 code base

2012-08-30 Thread Dan Magenheimer
Hi Greg -- gregkh If you feel that the existing code needs to be dropped gregkh and replaced with a totally new version, that's fine with gregkh me. It's forward progress, which is all that I ask for. (http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1208.0/02240.html, in reference to zcache,

Re: [PATCH 0/3] staging: ramster: move to new zcache2 code base

2012-08-30 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:46:01PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: Hi Greg -- gregkh If you feel that the existing code needs to be dropped gregkh and replaced with a totally new version, that's fine with gregkh me. It's forward progress, which is all that I ask for.