On 26/02/16 19:21, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tomi Valkeinen
> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:58:00 +0200
>
>> While doing this, did you just go forward removing the module support,
>> or did you check if it would be trivial to make the driver build as a
>> module? I wouldn't
On 26/02/16 19:21, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tomi Valkeinen
> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:58:00 +0200
>
>> While doing this, did you just go forward removing the module support,
>> or did you check if it would be trivial to make the driver build as a
>> module? I wouldn't be surprised if in some
From: Tomi Valkeinen
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:58:00 +0200
> While doing this, did you just go forward removing the module support,
> or did you check if it would be trivial to make the driver build as a
> module? I wouldn't be surprised if in some cases all that would
From: Tomi Valkeinen
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:58:00 +0200
> While doing this, did you just go forward removing the module support,
> or did you check if it would be trivial to make the driver build as a
> module? I wouldn't be surprised if in some cases all that would need to
> be done is
4 matches
Mail list logo