Hello,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/04/2014 08:53 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:43:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>did anyone try/suggest the
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 11/04/2014 08:53 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:43:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
did anyone try/suggest the following idea?
-
On 11/04/2014 08:53 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:43:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
did anyone try/suggest the following idea?
- keep CMA as fallback to MOVABLE as is is now, i.e. non-agressive
- when UNMOVABLE
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:43:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> >On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> >
>> >It's good to see another proposal to fix CMA utilization. Do you have
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:43:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
It's good to see another proposal to fix CMA utilization. Do you
On 11/04/2014 08:53 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:43:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
did anyone try/suggest the following idea?
- keep CMA as fallback to MOVABLE as is is now, i.e. non-agressive
- when UNMOVABLE
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:43:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> >
> >It's good to see another proposal to fix CMA utilization. Do you have
> >any data about the success rate of CMA contiguous
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:05:46PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:28:38PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35:47AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> > >> In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>
>> On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> It's good to see another proposal to fix CMA utilization. Do you have
>> any data about the success rate of CMA contiguous allocation after
>>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:28:38PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35:47AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> >> In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
> >> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
> >> MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:28:38PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35:47AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Vlastimil Babka vba...@suse.cz wrote:
On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
It's good to see another proposal to fix CMA utilization. Do you have
any data about the success rate of CMA contiguous allocation after
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:05:46PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:28:38PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35:47AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c,
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:43:33PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
It's good to see another proposal to fix CMA utilization. Do you have
any data about the success rate of CMA contiguous allocation after
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35:47AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
>> order that Linux kernel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35:47AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that
On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
It's good to see another proposal to fix CMA utilization. Do you have
any data about the success rate of CMA contiguous allocation after
this patch series? I played around with a similar approach of using
CMA for
On 10/16/2014 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
It's good to see another proposal to fix CMA utilization. Do you have
any data about the success rate of CMA contiguous allocation after
this patch series? I played around with a similar approach of using
CMA for
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35:47AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
> MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
> order that Linux kernel want.
>
> If a system that has a lot of user space program is
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35:47AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel want.
If a system that has a lot of user space program is
On 10/22/14 20:02, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 10/16/2014 04:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
>>> In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
>>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
>>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
>>> order
On 10/16/2014 04:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
>> order that Linux kernel want.
>>
>> If a system that has
On 10/22/14 20:02, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 10/16/2014 04:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel
On 10/16/2014 04:55 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel want.
If a system that has a lot of
On 10/16/14 16:56, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
>> order that Linux kernel want.
>>
>> If a system that has a
On 10/16/14 16:56, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel want.
If a system that has a lot of user
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel want.
If a system that has a lot of user space program is running, for
instance, an
On 10/15/2014 8:35 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel want.
If a system that has a lot of user space program is running, for
instance, an
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
> MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
> order that Linux kernel want.
>
> If a system that has a lot of user space program is running,
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel want.
If a system that has a lot of user space program is running, for
instance, an Android board, most of memory is in
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel want.
If a system that has a lot of user space program is running, for
instance, an Android board, most of memory is in
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Hui Zhu zhu...@xiaomi.com wrote:
In fallbacks of page_alloc.c, MIGRATE_CMA is the fallback of
MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
MIGRATE_MOVABLE will use MIGRATE_CMA when it doesn't have a page in
order that Linux kernel want.
If a system that has a lot of user space program
32 matches
Mail list logo
