Re: [PATCH 0/4] LightNVM patches for 4.5-rc

2016-02-26 Thread Jens Axboe
On 02/26/2016 10:21 AM, Matias Bjorling wrote: On 02/20/2016 08:52 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote: Hi Jens, Sorry, I was living in a fairy tail land, where patches are miraculously applied without being sent upstream. Leading me to test on top of the wrong base. I was missing three patches, which

Re: [PATCH 0/4] LightNVM patches for 4.5-rc

2016-02-26 Thread Jens Axboe
On 02/26/2016 10:21 AM, Matias Bjorling wrote: On 02/20/2016 08:52 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote: Hi Jens, Sorry, I was living in a fairy tail land, where patches are miraculously applied without being sent upstream. Leading me to test on top of the wrong base. I was missing three patches, which

Re: [PATCH 0/4] LightNVM patches for 4.5-rc

2016-02-26 Thread Matias Bjorling
On 02/20/2016 08:52 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Sorry, I was living in a fairy tail land, where patches are > miraculously applied without being sent upstream. Leading me to test > on top of the wrong base. > > I was missing three patches, which I should have sent for previous -rc

Re: [PATCH 0/4] LightNVM patches for 4.5-rc

2016-02-26 Thread Matias Bjorling
On 02/20/2016 08:52 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Sorry, I was living in a fairy tail land, where patches are > miraculously applied without being sent upstream. Leading me to test > on top of the wrong base. > > I was missing three patches, which I should have sent for previous -rc

[PATCH 0/4] LightNVM patches for 4.5-rc

2016-02-19 Thread Matias Bjørling
Hi Jens, Sorry, I was living in a fairy tail land, where patches are miraculously applied without being sent upstream. Leading me to test on top of the wrong base. I was missing three patches, which I should have sent for previous -rc round. The first patch fixes taking a normal spinlock in

[PATCH 0/4] LightNVM patches for 4.5-rc

2016-02-19 Thread Matias Bjørling
Hi Jens, Sorry, I was living in a fairy tail land, where patches are miraculously applied without being sent upstream. Leading me to test on top of the wrong base. I was missing three patches, which I should have sent for previous -rc round. The first patch fixes taking a normal spinlock in