On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:50:22PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 May 2014 22:19:55 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
> > wrote:
> >
> >> > A much nicer interface would be for us to (finally!) implement
> >> > fincore(), perhaps
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2014 22:19:55 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
> wrote:
>
>> > A much nicer interface would be for us to (finally!) implement
>> > fincore(), perhaps with an enhanced per-present-page payload which
>> > presents the info which you need
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 22:19:55 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com wrote:
A much nicer interface would be for us to (finally!) implement
fincore(), perhaps with an enhanced per-present-page payload
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:50:22PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 22:19:55 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com wrote:
A much nicer interface would be for us to
On Wed, 21 May 2014 22:19:55 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
wrote:
> > A much nicer interface would be for us to (finally!) implement
> > fincore(), perhaps with an enhanced per-present-page payload which
> > presents the info which you need (although we don't actually know what
> > that info is!).
>
>
On Tue, 20 May 2014 22:26:30 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
wrote:
> This patchset adds a new procfs interface to extrace information about
> pagecache status. In-kernel tool tools/vm/page-types.c has already some
> code for pagecache scanning without kernel's help, but it's not free
> from
On Tue, 20 May 2014 22:26:30 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com
wrote:
This patchset adds a new procfs interface to extrace information about
pagecache status. In-kernel tool tools/vm/page-types.c has already some
code for pagecache scanning without kernel's help, but it's not
On Wed, 21 May 2014 22:19:55 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com
wrote:
A much nicer interface would be for us to (finally!) implement
fincore(), perhaps with an enhanced per-present-page payload which
presents the info which you need (although we don't actually know what
This patchset adds a new procfs interface to extrace information about
pagecache status. In-kernel tool tools/vm/page-types.c has already some
code for pagecache scanning without kernel's help, but it's not free
from measurement-disturbance, so here I'm suggesting another approach.
Patch 1/4
This patchset adds a new procfs interface to extrace information about
pagecache status. In-kernel tool tools/vm/page-types.c has already some
code for pagecache scanning without kernel's help, but it's not free
from measurement-disturbance, so here I'm suggesting another approach.
Patch 1/4
10 matches
Mail list logo