Re: [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED

2015-01-14 Thread Paul Bolle
David, Koichi, On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 20:31 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > 0) Raised before in > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-am33-list/2011-November/msg7.html . > > 1) Discussed, at length, in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/9/164 . > > 2) Compile tested only (on top of next-20140918,

Re: [PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED

2015-01-14 Thread Paul Bolle
David, Koichi, On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 20:31 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: 0) Raised before in https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-am33-list/2011-November/msg7.html . 1) Discussed, at length, in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/9/164 . 2) Compile tested only (on top of next-20140918, using

[PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Bolle
0) Raised before in https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-am33-list/2011-November/msg7.html . 1) Discussed, at length, in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/9/164 . 2) Compile tested only (on top of next-20140918, using arch/mn10300/configs/asb2303_defconfig). 3) Logically this should be one

[PATCH 0/5] MN10300: Remove dead code depending on DEPRECATED

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Bolle
0) Raised before in https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-am33-list/2011-November/msg7.html . 1) Discussed, at length, in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/9/164 . 2) Compile tested only (on top of next-20140918, using arch/mn10300/configs/asb2303_defconfig). 3) Logically this should be one