Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-09-02 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > I put a topic/for-asoc branch upstream for you to pull from: Great, thanks! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-09-02 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Mark, On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:08:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:48:47PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > > As I'd prefer to carry the MFD ones (Including the twl6040 one) through > > mfd-next, I can build a branch for you to pull from. Would that be fine > > with

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-09-02 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Mark, On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:08:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:48:47PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: As I'd prefer to carry the MFD ones (Including the twl6040 one) through mfd-next, I can build a branch for you to pull from. Would that be fine with you ?

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-09-02 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: I put a topic/for-asoc branch upstream for you to pull from: Great, thanks! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-09-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:48:47PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > As I'd prefer to carry the MFD ones (Including the twl6040 one) through > mfd-next, I can build a branch for you to pull from. Would that be fine > with you ? That's fine by me, I just want the patches in ASoC - obviously the branch

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-09-01 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Mark, On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:07:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > This patch series removes the use of the ASoC-level read and write > functions from the cq93vc driver as part of a wider push to remove them > completely and just use regmap for all register I/O. Since the driver > is

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-09-01 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Mark, On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:07:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: This patch series removes the use of the ASoC-level read and write functions from the cq93vc driver as part of a wider push to remove them completely and just use regmap for all register I/O. Since the driver is essentially

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-09-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:48:47PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: As I'd prefer to carry the MFD ones (Including the twl6040 one) through mfd-next, I can build a branch for you to pull from. Would that be fine with you ? That's fine by me, I just want the patches in ASoC - obviously the branch

[PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-08-31 Thread Mark Brown
This patch series removes the use of the ASoC-level read and write functions from the cq93vc driver as part of a wider push to remove them completely and just use regmap for all register I/O. Since the driver is essentially doing what regmap-mmio is doing this is done by adding a MMIO regmap to

[PATCH 0/5] Remove ASoC-level I/O functions from cq93vc

2013-08-31 Thread Mark Brown
This patch series removes the use of the ASoC-level read and write functions from the cq93vc driver as part of a wider push to remove them completely and just use regmap for all register I/O. Since the driver is essentially doing what regmap-mmio is doing this is done by adding a MMIO regmap to