On 12/14/23 08:32, Lukasz Luba wrote:
On 12/14/23 08:29, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 09:21, Lukasz Luba wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I've been waiting for this feature, thanks!
On 12/12/23 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Following the consolidation and cleanup of CPU capacity in
On 12/14/23 08:29, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 09:21, Lukasz Luba wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I've been waiting for this feature, thanks!
On 12/12/23 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Following the consolidation and cleanup of CPU capacity in [1], this serie
reworks how the schedul
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 09:21, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> I've been waiting for this feature, thanks!
>
>
> On 12/12/23 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Following the consolidation and cleanup of CPU capacity in [1], this serie
> > reworks how the scheduler gets the pressures on CPUs.
Hi Vincent,
I've been waiting for this feature, thanks!
On 12/12/23 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Following the consolidation and cleanup of CPU capacity in [1], this serie
reworks how the scheduler gets the pressures on CPUs. We need to take into
account all pressures applied by cpufreq on th
Following the consolidation and cleanup of CPU capacity in [1], this serie
reworks how the scheduler gets the pressures on CPUs. We need to take into
account all pressures applied by cpufreq on the compute capacity of a CPU
for dozens of ms or more and not only cpufreq cooling device or HW
mitigiat
5 matches
Mail list logo
