* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at all the architectures and found that the disparity of the
> type of the "lock" field in struct rwlock_t is even larger than I had
> indicated in my earlier email. I am attaching a proof of concept
> patch to handle this. If this looks
* Frank Rowand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at all the architectures and found that the disparity of the
type of the lock field in struct rwlock_t is even larger than I had
indicated in my earlier email. I am attaching a proof of concept
patch to handle this. If this looks like a
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
< more stuff deleted >
I'm working on the architecture support for realtime on PPC64 now. If
the lock field of struct raw_rwlock_t is a long instead of int then
/proc/meminfo shows MemFree decreasing from 485608 kB to 485352 kB.
Do
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Frank Rowand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more stuff deleted
I'm working on the architecture support for realtime on PPC64 now. If
the lock field of struct raw_rwlock_t is a long instead of int then
/proc/meminfo shows MemFree decreasing from 485608 kB to 485352 kB.
Do you
* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> < more stuff deleted >
>
> I'm working on the architecture support for realtime on PPC64 now. If
> the lock field of struct raw_rwlock_t is a long instead of int then
> /proc/meminfo shows MemFree decreasing from 485608 kB to 485352 kB.
>
> Do you
* Frank Rowand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more stuff deleted
I'm working on the architecture support for realtime on PPC64 now. If
the lock field of struct raw_rwlock_t is a long instead of int then
/proc/meminfo shows MemFree decreasing from 485608 kB to 485352 kB.
Do you have a
Frank Rowand wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
My turn to be late, but now I'm back from vacation :-).
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The patches
Frank Rowand wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
My turn to be late, but now I'm back from vacation :-).
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches are:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
My turn to be late, but now I'm back from vacation :-).
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The patches are:
1/5 ppc_rt.patch
Ingo Molnar wrote:
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
My turn to be late, but now I'm back from vacation :-).
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches are:
1/5 ppc_rt.patch
* K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >to drive things forward, i've applied the first 3 patches (except the
> >rt_lock.h chunk from the first patch), and released it as part of the
> >40-03 patch:
> >
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
> >
>
> Is no one else having trouble
* K.R. Foley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to drive things forward, i've applied the first 3 patches (except the
rt_lock.h chunk from the first patch), and released it as part of the
40-03 patch:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
Is no one else having trouble compiling this one?
Ingo Molnar wrote:
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The patches are:
1/5 ppc_rt.patch - the core realtime functionality for PPC
what is
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patches are:
>
> 1/5 ppc_rt.patch - the core realtime functionality for PPC
what is the
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches are:
1/5 ppc_rt.patch - the core realtime functionality for PPC
what is the rationale
Ingo Molnar wrote:
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches are:
1/5 ppc_rt.patch - the core realtime functionality for PPC
what is
Ingo,
I have updated my patch of 16 Feb 2005 that adds realtime support for PowerPC
(32 bit only). The patches will be sent in following emails.
The patch series applies over Ingo's real-time preempt patch:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/realtime-preempt-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02
Ingo,
I have updated my patch of 16 Feb 2005 that adds realtime support for PowerPC
(32 bit only). The patches will be sent in following emails.
The patch series applies over Ingo's real-time preempt patch:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/realtime-preempt-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02
18 matches
Mail list logo
