On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:05:48PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> >>
> >>> On 07/26/2016
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:05:48PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> >>
> >>> On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 08:20:27PM +0200, Alban Crequy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 July 2016 at 20:20, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
> > to discover these relationships.
> >
> > Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical.
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 08:20:27PM +0200, Alban Crequy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 July 2016 at 20:20, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
> > to discover these relationships.
> >
> > Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to
Hi,
On 14 July 2016 at 20:20, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
> to discover these relationships.
>
> Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
> parent-child relationships too.
>
> Why we may
Hi,
On 14 July 2016 at 20:20, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
> to discover these relationships.
>
> Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
> parent-child relationships too.
>
> Why we may want to know
Hi Eric,
On 07/29/2016 08:05 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
Hi Eric,
On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On
Hi Eric,
On 07/29/2016 08:05 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
Hi Eric,
On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>>
>>> On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>>
>>> On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
>>
If we
Hi Eric,
On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
If we want to compare two file descriptors of
Hi Eric,
On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
If we want to compare two file descriptors of the current process,
it
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> If we want to compare two file descriptors of the current process,
>> it is one of cases for which kcmp
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> If we want to compare two file descriptors of the current process,
>> it is one of cases for which kcmp can be used. We can call
On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
Hello Andrew,
On 26 July 2016 at 20:25, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
On
On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
Hello Andrew,
On 26 July 2016 at 20:25, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:32:25AM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:25:24AM -0700, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > Sure. If a process wants to compare two namespaces, it needs to get file
> > descriptors for them (open /proc/PID/ns/XXX, use new ioctl-s, find a
> > process which
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:32:25AM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:25:24AM -0700, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > Sure. If a process wants to compare two namespaces, it needs to get file
> > descriptors for them (open /proc/PID/ns/XXX, use new ioctl-s, find a
> > process which
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > [snip]
>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > [snip]
> > > > > > So, from my
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On 26 July 2016 at 20:25, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> >> On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On 26 July 2016 at 20:25, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> >> On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 25,
Andrew Vagin writes:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>
> [snip]
>
>> [snip]
>> >>> So, from my point of view, the important piece that was missing from
>> >>> your commit
Andrew Vagin writes:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>
> [snip]
>
>> [snip]
>> >>> So, from my point of view, the important piece that was missing from
>> >>> your commit message was the note to use
Hello Andrew,
On 26 July 2016 at 20:25, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > "Michael
Hello Andrew,
On 26 July 2016 at 20:25, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)"
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:25:24AM -0700, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> Sure. If a process wants to compare two namespaces, it needs to get file
> descriptors for them (open /proc/PID/ns/XXX, use new ioctl-s, find a
> process which has them),
> and then it calls kcmp(pid1, pid2, KCMP_NSFD, ns_fd1, ns_fd2)
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:25:24AM -0700, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> Sure. If a process wants to compare two namespaces, it needs to get file
> descriptors for them (open /proc/PID/ns/XXX, use new ioctl-s, find a
> process which has them),
> and then it calls kcmp(pid1, pid2, KCMP_NSFD, ns_fd1, ns_fd2)
On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
[snip]
[snip]
So, from my point of view, the important piece that was missing from
your commit message was the note
On 07/26/2016 04:54 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
[snip]
[snip]
So, from my point of view, the important piece that was missing from
your commit message was the note to use
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
[snip]
> [snip]
> >>> So, from my point of view, the important piece that was missing from
> >>> your commit message was the note to use
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:59:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
[snip]
> [snip]
> >>> So, from my point of view, the important piece that was missing from
> >>> your commit message was the note to use readlink("/proc/self/fd/%d")
> >>> on the returned
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:10:21AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrey Vagin writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I forgot to add --cc-cover for git send-email, so everyone who is in
> > Cc got only a cover letter. All messages were sent in mail lists.
> >
> > Sorry for
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:10:21AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrey Vagin writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I forgot to add --cc-cover for git send-email, so everyone who is in
> > Cc got only a cover letter. All messages were sent in mail lists.
> >
> > Sorry for inconvenience.
>
> Mostly
"Serge E. Hallyn" writes:
> Quoting Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) (mtk.manpa...@gmail.com):
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 07/25/2016 03:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>> >
>> >>Hi Andrey,
>> >>
>> >>On 07/22/2016 08:25
"Serge E. Hallyn" writes:
> Quoting Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) (mtk.manpa...@gmail.com):
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 07/25/2016 03:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>> >
>> >>Hi Andrey,
>> >>
>> >>On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>> >>Perhaps add
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 07/25/2016 03:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>>
>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>
>>> On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 07/25/2016 03:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>>
>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>
>>> On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
Quoting Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) (mtk.manpa...@gmail.com):
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 07/25/2016 03:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> >
> >>Hi Andrey,
> >>
> >>On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at
Quoting Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) (mtk.manpa...@gmail.com):
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 07/25/2016 03:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> >
> >>Hi Andrey,
> >>
> >>On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk
Hi Eric,
On 07/25/2016 03:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
Hi Andrey,
On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On
Hi Eric,
On 07/25/2016 03:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
Hi Andrey,
On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On 07/21/2016 11:06 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Thu,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/21/2016 11:06 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/21/2016 11:06 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:41:12PM
Hi Andrey,
On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On 07/21/2016 11:06 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
Hi
Hi Andrey,
On 07/22/2016 08:25 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On 07/21/2016 11:06 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On 07/14/2016 08:20
Andrey Vagin writes:
> Hello,
>
> I forgot to add --cc-cover for git send-email, so everyone who is in
> Cc got only a cover letter. All messages were sent in mail lists.
>
> Sorry for inconvenience.
Mostly the code looked sensible. But I had a couple of issues.
Resend this
Andrey Vagin writes:
> Hello,
>
> I forgot to add --cc-cover for git send-email, so everyone who is in
> Cc got only a cover letter. All messages were sent in mail lists.
>
> Sorry for inconvenience.
Mostly the code looked sensible. But I had a couple of issues.
Resend this in September (when
"W. Trevor King" writes:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 04:56:44PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "W. Trevor King" writes:
>> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
>>
"W. Trevor King" writes:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 04:56:44PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "W. Trevor King" writes:
>> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
>> >> > namespaces(7) and clone(2) both
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 04:56:44PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "W. Trevor King" writes:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> >> > namespaces(7) and clone(2) both have:
> >> >
>
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 04:56:44PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "W. Trevor King" writes:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> >> > namespaces(7) and clone(2) both have:
> >> >
> >> > When a
"W. Trevor King" writes:
2> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
>> > namespaces(7) and clone(2) both have:
>> >
>> > When a network namespace is freed (i.e., when the last process
>> >
"W. Trevor King" writes:
2> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
>> > namespaces(7) and clone(2) both have:
>> >
>> > When a network namespace is freed (i.e., when the last process
>> > in the namespace
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > namespaces(7) and clone(2) both have:
> >
> > When a network namespace is freed (i.e., when the last process
> > in the namespace terminates), its physical network
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > namespaces(7) and clone(2) both have:
> >
> > When a network namespace is freed (i.e., when the last process
> > in the namespace terminates), its physical network
On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:20:14AM -0700, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to
> > discover parent-child relationships too.
>
> It bothers me that network namespaces are not hierarchical too
On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 14:14 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:20:14AM -0700, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to
> > discover parent-child relationships too.
>
> It bothers me that network namespaces are not hierarchical too
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:20:14AM -0700, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
> parent-child relationships too.
It bothers me that network namespaces are not hierarchical too ;).
namespaces(7) and clone(2) both have:
When a network
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:20:14AM -0700, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
> parent-child relationships too.
It bothers me that network namespaces are not hierarchical too ;).
namespaces(7) and clone(2) both have:
When a network
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
>
> On 07/21/2016 11:06 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>
>>> On 07/14/2016 08:20 PM,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
>
> On 07/21/2016 11:06 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>
>>> On 07/14/2016 08:20 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On 07/14/2016 08:20 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>
> Could you add here an of the API in detail: what do these FDs refer to,
> and how do you use them to solve the use case? And could you you add
> that
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On 07/14/2016 08:20 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>
> Could you add here an of the API in detail: what do these FDs refer to,
> and how do you use them to solve the use case? And could you you add
> that
Hi Andrey,
On 07/14/2016 08:20 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
to discover these relationships.
Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
parent-child relationships too.
Why we may want to know
Hi Andrey,
On 07/14/2016 08:20 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
to discover these relationships.
Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
parent-child relationships too.
Why we may want to know
Hello,
I forgot to add --cc-cover for git send-email, so everyone who is in
Cc got only a cover letter. All messages were sent in mail lists.
Sorry for inconvenience.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now
Hello,
I forgot to add --cc-cover for git send-email, so everyone who is in
Cc got only a cover letter. All messages were sent in mail lists.
Sorry for inconvenience.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
>
Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
to discover these relationships.
Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
parent-child relationships too.
Why we may want to know relationships between namespaces?
One use would be visualization, in
Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
to discover these relationships.
Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
parent-child relationships too.
Why we may want to know relationships between namespaces?
One use would be visualization, in
70 matches
Mail list logo