Ping again. Is there still any interest in the patchset?
Arnd, Ingo?
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 02:34:43PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:43:15PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > The series is the result of this discussion:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/12/665
> >
Ping again. Is there still any interest in the patchset?
Arnd, Ingo?
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 02:34:43PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:43:15PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > The series is the result of this discussion:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/12/665
> >
Ping?
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:43:15PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> The series is the result of this discussion:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/12/665
> plus this patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/13/137
> (I'd like to have it together with others.)
>
> Patch 1 remove useless
Ping?
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:43:15PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> The series is the result of this discussion:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/12/665
> plus this patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/13/137
> (I'd like to have it together with others.)
>
> Patch 1 remove useless
The series is the result of this discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/12/665
plus this patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/13/137
(I'd like to have it together with others.)
Patch 1 remove useless GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT option. Patches 2 and 3 change
the order of macros definition and/or
The series is the result of this discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/12/665
plus this patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/13/137
(I'd like to have it together with others.)
Patch 1 remove useless GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT option. Patches 2 and 3 change
the order of macros definition and/or
6 matches
Mail list logo
