Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: psci: cpuidle: PSCI CPUidle rework

2019-07-23 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 01:49:15PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 17:37, Lorenzo Pieralisi > wrote: > > > > Current PSCI CPUidle driver is built on top of the generic ARM > > CPUidle infrastructure that relies on the architectural back-end > > idle operations to initialize and

Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: psci: cpuidle: PSCI CPUidle rework

2019-07-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 17:37, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > Current PSCI CPUidle driver is built on top of the generic ARM > CPUidle infrastructure that relies on the architectural back-end > idle operations to initialize and enter idle states. > > On ARM64 systems, PSCI is the only interface the

[PATCH 0/6] ARM: psci: cpuidle: PSCI CPUidle rework

2019-07-22 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
Current PSCI CPUidle driver is built on top of the generic ARM CPUidle infrastructure that relies on the architectural back-end idle operations to initialize and enter idle states. On ARM64 systems, PSCI is the only interface the kernel ever uses to enter idle states, so, having to rely on a