Re: [PATCH 0/8] Time fixes and cleanups for 3.6

On 07/12/2012 11:05 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: Looks sensible. Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo Thanks for the review! I've added your changes and your reviewed by tag and pushed it out to my fortglx/3.6/time branch. Here's the updated pull request below (Sorry for the

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Time fixes and cleanups for 3.6

Looks sensible. Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Time fixes and cleanups for 3.6

Looks sensible. Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Time fixes and cleanups for 3.6

On 07/12/2012 11:05 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: Looks sensible. Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org Thanks, Ingo Thanks for the review! I've added your changes and your reviewed by tag and pushed it out to my fortglx/3.6/time branch. Here's the updated pull request below

[PATCH 0/8] Time fixes and cleanups for 3.6

Hey Thomas, Since you're offline next week, I wanted to send you my updated queue for the 3.6 merge window. These are mostly the same changes I sent you with my earlier 3.6 pull request mid-last month, but reordered and trimmed down to focus on cleanups (no new features). There is one

[PATCH 0/8] Time fixes and cleanups for 3.6

Hey Thomas, Since you're offline next week, I wanted to send you my updated queue for the 3.6 merge window. These are mostly the same changes I sent you with my earlier 3.6 pull request mid-last month, but reordered and trimmed down to focus on cleanups (no new features). There is one