Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-19 Thread Dhaval Giani
On 2013-06-19 12:41 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hello Dhaval, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:59:02PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: On 2013-06-18 12:11 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hello Dhaval, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: Hi John, I have been giving your git tree a whirl,

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-19 Thread Dhaval Giani
On 2013-06-19 12:41 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hello Dhaval, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:59:02PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: On 2013-06-18 12:11 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hello Dhaval, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: Hi John, I have been giving your git tree a whirl,

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-18 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello Dhaval, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:59:02PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: > On 2013-06-18 12:11 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >Hello Dhaval, > > > >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: > >>Hi John, > >> > >>I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-18 Thread Dhaval Giani
On 2013-06-18 12:11 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hello Dhaval, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: Hi John, I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a limited memory environment, I was using memory cgroups. The program I was using to test is

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-18 Thread Dhaval Giani
On 2013-06-18 12:11 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hello Dhaval, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: Hi John, I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a limited memory environment, I was using memory cgroups. The program I was using to test is

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-18 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello Dhaval, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:59:02PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: On 2013-06-18 12:11 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hello Dhaval, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: Hi John, I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a limited memory

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-17 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello Dhaval, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: > Hi John, > > I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a > limited memory environment, I was using memory cgroups. > > The program I was using to test is attached here. It is your test > code,

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-17 Thread Dhaval Giani
Hi John, I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a limited memory environment, I was using memory cgroups. The program I was using to test is attached here. It is your test code, with some changes (changing the syscall interface, reducing the memory pressure to be

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-17 Thread Dhaval Giani
Hi John, I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a limited memory environment, I was using memory cgroups. The program I was using to test is attached here. It is your test code, with some changes (changing the syscall interface, reducing the memory pressure to be

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-17 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello Dhaval, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote: Hi John, I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a limited memory environment, I was using memory cgroups. The program I was using to test is attached here. It is your test code, with

[PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-11 Thread John Stultz
Hey everyone. I know its been quite awhile. But Minchan and I have been doing a fair amount of discussing offlist since lsf-mm, trying to come to agreement on the semantics for the volatile ranges interface, and after circling around each other's arguments for awhile (he'd suggest and idea, I'd

[PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)

2013-06-11 Thread John Stultz
Hey everyone. I know its been quite awhile. But Minchan and I have been doing a fair amount of discussing offlist since lsf-mm, trying to come to agreement on the semantics for the volatile ranges interface, and after circling around each other's arguments for awhile (he'd suggest and idea, I'd