Hi Jan,
> > > > I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> > > > firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
> > >
> > > That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
> > > the IHEX format parser is not in any way keyspan
On Apr 5, 2005 6:45 AM, Jan Harkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:22:06AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> > firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
>
> That's what I had
Hi Dmitry,
> > People are also working on a replacement for the
> > current request_firmware(), because the needs are changing. Try to keep
> > it close with the usb-serial for now.
> >
>
> Could you elaborate on what do you think is needed? I have some of
> patches to firmware loader and
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:36:31PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > > I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> > > firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
> >
> > That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
> > the
On Apr 5, 2005 9:36 AM, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People are also working on a replacement for the
> current request_firmware(), because the needs are changing. Try to keep
> it close with the usb-serial for now.
>
Could you elaborate on what do you think is needed? I have
Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:23:29AM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
> This ofcourse doesn't actually solve Debian's distribution issues since
> the keyspan firmware can only be distributed as part of 'Linux or other
> Open Source operating system kernel'.
Well, if this is the case, it
Hi Jan,
> > I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> > firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
>
> That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
> the IHEX format parser is not in any way keyspan specific and there are
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:22:06AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
> firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
the IHEX format parser is
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:51 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Firmware loader is format-agnostic, I think having IHEX parser in a separate
> > file would be better...
>
> Why should this be in-kernel at all? Convert the firmware into
Hi Jan,
> > > > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
> > > >
> > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/04/msg00145.html
> > > >
> > > > Can you summarize the conclusion of the thread, or what you did get
> > > > from it,
> > > > please ?
> > >
> >
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:51 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Monday 04 April 2005 23:23, Jan Harkes wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan
Hi Jan,
I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
the IHEX format parser is not in any way keyspan specific and there
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:51 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2005 23:23, Jan Harkes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware,
Hi Jan,
Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/04/msg00145.html
Can you summarize the conclusion of the thread, or what you did get
from it,
please ?
That people didn't like the
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:51 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Firmware loader is format-agnostic, I think having IHEX parser in a separate
file would be better...
Why should this be in-kernel at all? Convert the firmware into a
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:22:06AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
the IHEX format parser is
Hi Jan,
I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
the IHEX format parser is not in any way keyspan specific and there are
Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:23:29AM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
This ofcourse doesn't actually solve Debian's distribution issues since
the keyspan firmware can only be distributed as part of 'Linux or other
Open Source operating system kernel'.
Well, if this is the case, it
On Apr 5, 2005 9:36 AM, Marcel Holtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People are also working on a replacement for the
current request_firmware(), because the needs are changing. Try to keep
it close with the usb-serial for now.
Could you elaborate on what do you think is needed? I have some of
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:36:31PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
That's what I had originally, actually called firmware_ihex.ko, since
the IHEX format
Hi Dmitry,
People are also working on a replacement for the
current request_firmware(), because the needs are changing. Try to keep
it close with the usb-serial for now.
Could you elaborate on what do you think is needed? I have some of
patches to firmware loader and wondering if we
On Apr 5, 2005 6:45 AM, Jan Harkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:22:06AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
I agree with Dmitry on this point. The IHEX parser should not be inside
firmware_class.c. What about using keyspan_ihex.[ch] for it?
That's what I had originally,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:23:29AM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
> > >
> > >
On Monday 04 April 2005 23:23, Jan Harkes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/04/msg00145.html
> >
> > Can you summarize the
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/04/msg00145.html
Can you summarize the conclusion of
On Monday 04 April 2005 23:23, Jan Harkes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:23:29AM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ?
28 matches
Mail list logo
