On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:00:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> After poking at them a little more I feel somewhat more confident.
>
> I found one more bug, but this one was my own fault, we should also clear
> sds->busiest_stat.avg_load because update_sd_pick_busiest() reads that before
>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:00:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
After poking at them a little more I feel somewhat more confident.
I found one more bug, but this one was my own fault, we should also clear
sds-busiest_stat.avg_load because update_sd_pick_busiest() reads that before
we set
After poking at them a little more I feel somewhat more confident.
I found one more bug, but this one was my own fault, we should also clear
sds->busiest_stat.avg_load because update_sd_pick_busiest() reads that before
we set it.
Moved the memset optimization and the fix for that into a
After poking at them a little more I feel somewhat more confident.
I found one more bug, but this one was my own fault, we should also clear
sds-busiest_stat.avg_load because update_sd_pick_busiest() reads that before
we set it.
Moved the memset optimization and the fix for that into a separate
4 matches
Mail list logo