Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On 2015-10-28 01:46, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's >> touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major >> users of it. Please make sure none

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On 2015-10-28 01:46, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's >> touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major >> users of it. Please

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 01:30:59AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 10/28/2015 01:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:42:01AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: > >>- The script now prints the warnings on stderr, and returns non-0 when > >> something is encountered > > > >This one

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On 10/28/2015 01:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:42:01AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: Hi, Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major users of it. Please make sure none of

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 01:30:59AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 10/28/2015 01:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:42:01AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: > >>- The script now prints the warnings on stderr, and returns non-0 when > >> something is encountered > > > >This one

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On 10/28/2015 01:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:42:01AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: Hi, Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major users of it. Please make sure none of

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:42:01AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's > touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major > users of it. Please make sure none of these changes break your use cases.

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's > touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major > users of it. Please make sure none of these changes break your use cases. Actually, I

[PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

Hi, Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major users of it. Please make sure none of these changes break your use cases. I've done some reworks of merge_config.sh. I was quite hesitant to start

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's > touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major > users of it. Please make sure none of these changes break your use

[PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

Hi, Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major users of it. Please make sure none of these changes break your use cases. I've done some reworks of merge_config.sh. I was quite hesitant to start

Re: [PATCH 00/10] merge_config misc reworks and testcases

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:42:01AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > Somewhat wide distribution list here, since I've added everyone who's > touched the script, with the presumption that those have been the major > users of it. Please make sure none of these changes break your use cases.