On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:15:29AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:14 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:14:47AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > There is some clear peformance impact when you are running frequent
> > > queries of the i_version.
> > >
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:15:29AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:14 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:14:47AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > There is some clear peformance impact when you are running frequent
> > > queries of the i_version.
> > >
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:14 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:14:47AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 19:02 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:03 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:14 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:14:47AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 19:02 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:03 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:14:47AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 19:02 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:03 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:14:47AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 19:02 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:03 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 19:02 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:03 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > This is great, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 19:02 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:03 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > This is great, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:03 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > This is great, thanks.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > With
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:03 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > This is great, thanks.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > With
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > This is great, thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > With this, we reduce inode metadata updates across all 3 filesystems
> > >
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > This is great, thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > With this, we reduce inode metadata updates across all 3 filesystems
> > >
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 15:14 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > This is great, thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > With this, we reduce inode metadata updates across all 3 filesystems
> > > down
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 15:14 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > This is great, thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > With this, we reduce inode metadata updates across all 3 filesystems
> > > down
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> This is great, thanks.
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > With this, we reduce inode metadata updates across all 3 filesystems
> > down to roughly the frequency of the timestamp granularity, particularly
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:05 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> This is great, thanks.
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > With this, we reduce inode metadata updates across all 3 filesystems
> > down to roughly the frequency of the timestamp granularity, particularly
This is great, thanks.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> With this, we reduce inode metadata updates across all 3 filesystems
> down to roughly the frequency of the timestamp granularity, particularly
> when it's not being queried (the vastly common case).
>
> The
This is great, thanks.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> With this, we reduce inode metadata updates across all 3 filesystems
> down to roughly the frequency of the timestamp granularity, particularly
> when it's not being queried (the vastly common case).
>
> The
From: Jeff Layton
About a year ago, I sent a pile of patches that overhauled how the
inode->i_version field is handled in filesystems. This is a follow up
to that initial series.
tl;dr: I think we can greatly reduce the cost of the inode->i_version
counter, by exploiting the
From: Jeff Layton
About a year ago, I sent a pile of patches that overhauled how the
inode->i_version field is handled in filesystems. This is a follow up
to that initial series.
tl;dr: I think we can greatly reduce the cost of the inode->i_version
counter, by exploiting the fact that we don't
20 matches
Mail list logo