On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 07:54:48AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
> Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
> is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
> for an introduction to rhashtable.
>
> This
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 07:54:48AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
> Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
> is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
> for an introduction to rhashtable.
>
> This
>>> libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
>>> Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
>>> is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
>>> for an introduction to rhashtable.
>>
>> Thansk for starting this work. I was think about cleaning
>>> libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
>>> Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
>>> is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
>>> for an introduction to rhashtable.
>>
>> Thansk for starting this work. I was think about cleaning
On Tue, Apr 17 2018, James Simmons wrote:
>> libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
>> Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
>> is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
>> for an introduction to rhashtable.
>
> Thansk for starting
On Tue, Apr 17 2018, James Simmons wrote:
>> libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
>> Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
>> is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
>> for an introduction to rhashtable.
>
> Thansk for starting
> libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
> Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
> is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
> for an introduction to rhashtable.
Thansk for starting this work. I was think about cleaning the libcfs
> libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
> Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
> is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
> for an introduction to rhashtable.
Thansk for starting this work. I was think about cleaning the libcfs
libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
for an introduction to rhashtable.
This series converts lustre to use rhashtable. This affects several
different
libcfs in lustre has a resizeable hashtable.
Linux already has a resizeable hashtable, rhashtable, which is better
is most metrics. See https://lwn.net/Articles/751374/ in a few days
for an introduction to rhashtable.
This series converts lustre to use rhashtable. This affects several
different
10 matches
Mail list logo
