* Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:linux-nvdimm-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> > Dan Williams
> > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 8:35 PM
> > To: linux-nvd...@lists.01.org
> > Subject: [
.org
>> Subject: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 00/21] ND: NFIT-Defined / NVDIMM Subsystem
>>
> ...
>> create mode 100644 drivers/block/nd/acpi.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/block/nd/blk.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/block/nd/bus.c
>> create mode 100644 driver
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:linux-nvdimm-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Dan Williams
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 8:35 PM
> To: linux-nvd...@lists.01.org
> Subject: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 00/21] ND: NFIT-Defined / NVDIMM Subsystem
>
...
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Since 2010 Intel has included non-volatile memory support on a few
> storage-focused platforms with a feature named ADR (Asynchronous DRAM
> Refresh). These platforms were mostly targeted at custom applications
> and never enjoyed standard di
Since 2010 Intel has included non-volatile memory support on a few
storage-focused platforms with a feature named ADR (Asynchronous DRAM
Refresh). These platforms were mostly targeted at custom applications
and never enjoyed standard discovery mechanisms for platform firmware
to advertise non-vola
5 matches
Mail list logo