On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 09:09 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Note that while you are addressing all the obvious candidates that
> have only a single #include statement in them, there is room to take
> this further because a lot of the other header files in architectures
> are still identical to
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 11:17 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On 13 October 2012 03:26, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Recently I suggested to someone that was adding a new asm file that
> > currently only contained an x86 change to add a header in all archs
> > that was just a wrapper
Hi Steven,
On 13 October 2012 03:26, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Recently I suggested to someone that was adding a new asm file that
> currently only contained an x86 change to add a header in all archs
> that was just a wrapper to point to the asm-generic version. I suggested
> this because that's
On Friday 12 October 2012 22:26:32 Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Please feel free to pluck these patches into your architecture and
> run them to make sure that they boot as well (I only had the compiler
> and not the box... Also I only tested with defconfig, I may have
> broken other configs).
>
>
On Friday 12 October 2012 22:26:32 Steven Rostedt wrote:
Please feel free to pluck these patches into your architecture and
run them to make sure that they boot as well (I only had the compiler
and not the box... Also I only tested with defconfig, I may have
broken other configs).
One
Hi Steven,
On 13 October 2012 03:26, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Recently I suggested to someone that was adding a new asm file that
currently only contained an x86 change to add a header in all archs
that was just a wrapper to point to the asm-generic version. I suggested
this
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 11:17 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Steven,
On 13 October 2012 03:26, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Recently I suggested to someone that was adding a new asm file that
currently only contained an x86 change to add a header in all archs
that was just a
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 09:09 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Note that while you are addressing all the obvious candidates that
have only a single #include statement in them, there is room to take
this further because a lot of the other header files in architectures
are still identical to their
Recently I suggested to someone that was adding a new asm file that
currently only contained an x86 change to add a header in all archs
that was just a wrapper to point to the asm-generic version. I suggested
this because that's the way we use to do it and just to refresh my
memory, I looked at
Recently I suggested to someone that was adding a new asm file that
currently only contained an x86 change to add a header in all archs
that was just a wrapper to point to the asm-generic version. I suggested
this because that's the way we use to do it and just to refresh my
memory, I looked at
10 matches
Mail list logo
