Re: [PATCH 00/36] AutoNUMA24

2012-08-23 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > > On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > >Hello everyone, > > > > > > > >Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new > > > >AutoNUMA

Re: [PATCH 00/36] AutoNUMA24

2012-08-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rik van Riel wrote: > > > On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > >Hello everyone, > > > > > >Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new > > >AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The la

Re: [PATCH 00/36] AutoNUMA24

2012-08-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Rik van Riel wrote: > On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > >Hello everyone, > > > >Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new > >AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The last review cycle > >has been fundamental in improving the patchset. Thanks! >

Re: [PATCH 00/36] AutoNUMA24

2012-08-22 Thread Rik van Riel
On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: Hello everyone, Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The last review cycle has been fundamental in improving the patchset. Thanks! Thanks for improving the code and incorp

[PATCH 00/36] AutoNUMA24

2012-08-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
Hello everyone, Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The last review cycle has been fundamental in improving the patchset. Thanks! The objective of AutoNUMA is to be able to perform as close as possible to (and sometime fa