Many ports (m32r, microblaze, mips, parisc, score, and sparc) use
functionally identical copies of various GCC library routine files,
which came up as we were submitting the RISC-V port (which also uses
some of these).
This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
Many ports (m32r, microblaze, mips, parisc, score, and sparc) use
functionally identical copies of various GCC library routine files,
which came up as we were submitting the RISC-V port (which also uses
some of these).
This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
On 07/10/2017 07:09 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:03:44 PDT (-0700), rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
>> On 07/10/2017 07:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Palmer,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt
>>> wrote:
This patch
On 07/10/2017 07:09 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:03:44 PDT (-0700), rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
>> On 07/10/2017 07:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Palmer,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt
>>> wrote:
This patch adds a new copy of
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:03:44 PDT (-0700), rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 07:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Palmer,
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:03:44 PDT (-0700), rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 07:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Palmer,
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
>>> functionally
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:02:19 PDT (-0700), s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
>> functionally identical to the various other copies.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:02:19 PDT (-0700), s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
>> functionally identical to the various other copies. These are
>>
On 07/10/2017 07:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
>> functionally identical to the various other copies. These are
>> availiable
On 07/10/2017 07:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
>> functionally identical to the various other copies. These are
>> availiable via Kconfig as
Hi Palmer,
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
> functionally identical to the various other copies. These are
> availiable via Kconfig as CONFIG_LIB_$ROUTINE, which currently isn't
Hi Palmer,
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:08 -0700 Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
> functionally identical to the various other copies. These are
> availiable via Kconfig as CONFIG_LIB_$ROUTINE, which currently isn't
Umm, the patch
Many ports (m32r, microblaze, mips, parisc, score, and sparc) use
functionally identical copies of various GCC library routine files,
which came up as we were submitting the RISC-V port (which also uses
some of these).
This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
Many ports (m32r, microblaze, mips, parisc, score, and sparc) use
functionally identical copies of various GCC library routine files,
which came up as we were submitting the RISC-V port (which also uses
some of these).
This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
14 matches
Mail list logo