On 29/08/2014 6:18 p.m., Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
But, for the current architecture, that should be just
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > But, for the current architecture, that should be just a clarification,
> > > not a
Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > But, for the current architecture, that should be just a clarification,
> > not a requirement for this specific test.
> I will keep that in mind.
> > Applying!
>
On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:08:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> Add a test that checks that sched_switch events and
>> tracking events can be recorded for a workload using the
>> evsel->system_wide and evsel->tracking flags
On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:08:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
Add a test that checks that sched_switch events and
tracking events can be recorded for a workload using the
evsel-system_wide and evsel-tracking flags (respectively)
with
Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
But, for the current architecture, that should be just a clarification,
not a requirement for this specific test.
I will keep that in mind.
Applying!
Thank you!
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
But, for the current architecture, that should be just a clarification,
not a requirement for
On 29/08/2014 6:18 p.m., Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
But, for the current architecture, that should be just
Em Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:08:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> + * test__switch_tracking - test using sched_switch and tracking events.
> + *
> + * This function implements a test that checks that sched_switch events and
> + * tracking events can be recorded for a workload (current process)
Em Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:08:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
+ * test__switch_tracking - test using sched_switch and tracking events.
+ *
+ * This function implements a test that checks that sched_switch events and
+ * tracking events can be recorded for a workload (current process) using
Em Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:08:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> Add a test that checks that sched_switch events and
> tracking events can be recorded for a workload using the
> evsel->system_wide and evsel->tracking flags (respectively)
> with other events sometimes enabled or disabled.
Em Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:08:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
Add a test that checks that sched_switch events and
tracking events can be recorded for a workload using the
evsel-system_wide and evsel-tracking flags (respectively)
with other events sometimes enabled or disabled.
Really nice
Add a test that checks that sched_switch events and
tracking events can be recorded for a workload using the
evsel->system_wide and evsel->tracking flags (respectively)
with other events sometimes enabled or disabled.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
---
tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 1 +
Add a test that checks that sched_switch events and
tracking events can be recorded for a workload using the
evsel-system_wide and evsel-tracking flags (respectively)
with other events sometimes enabled or disabled.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
