On Wednesday 11 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 06:11 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > It depends: if the driver is for the entire FPGA and does
> > the irqchip stuff in addition, it should probably live
> > in drivers/mfd. If it's a pure irqchip driver, drivers/irqchip
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 06:11 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It depends: if the driver is for the entire FPGA and does
> the irqchip stuff in addition, it should probably live
> in drivers/mfd. If it's a pure irqchip driver, drivers/irqchip
> is better. You have to be careful in the second case though
On Wednesday 11 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > It probably makes sense to have a single driver file for the
> > FPGA device that does this, and only split out the other devices
> > from it that consume the irqs.
>
> Is drivers/irqchip/ the right place this driver?
>
> I am asking becau
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 22:57 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It should be possible to make it a loadable module, with deferred
> probing etc. You wouldn't use IRQCHIP_DECLARE() for this though,
> but instead have a platform driver that sets up the irq domain.
Thanks for explaning.
> It probably make
On Tuesday 10 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:33 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 01:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >>
> >
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:33 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 01:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>
> >> > > +
> >> > > +static struct irq_chip lp8x4x_irq_chip = {
>
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 01:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> > > +
>> > > +static struct irq_chip lp8x4x_irq_chip = {
>> > > + .name = "FPGA",
>> > > + .irq_ack
On Friday 06 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 01:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Ideally we want shared defconfigs where you enable multiple (or all) pxa
> > boards
> > at once and end up with a kernel that works on all of them.
> >
> > For most other platforms
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 01:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 01 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/lp8x4x_defconfig
> > b/arch/arm/configs/lp8x4x_defconfig
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..5cd6d38
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/conf
On Sunday 01 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/lp8x4x_defconfig
> b/arch/arm/configs/lp8x4x_defconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..5cd6d38
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/lp8x4x_defconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,2320 @@
> +#
> +# Automatically genera
10 matches
Mail list logo