On 2/16/21 9:48 AM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:24:59PM IST, Alex Elder wrote:
This is a good change. But while you're at it, I would
appreciate if you would convert a few spots to use
sizeof(dest) rather than a fixed constant. I will
point them out below.
If
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:24:59PM IST, Alex Elder wrote:
> This is a good change. But while you're at it, I would
> appreciate if you would convert a few spots to use
> sizeof(dest) rather than a fixed constant. I will
> point them out below.
>
> If this is the *only* request for a change on
On 1/31/21 11:28 AM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related
4 matches
Mail list logo
