From: Namhyung Kim
The print format of s32 type was "ld" and it's casted to "long". So
it turned out to print 4294967295 for "-1" on 64-bit systems. Not
sure whether it worked well on 32-bit systems.
Anyway, it doesn't need to have cast argument at all since it already
casted using type
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The print format of s32 type was ld and it's casted to long. So
it turned out to print 4294967295 for -1 on 64-bit systems. Not
sure whether it worked well on 32-bit systems.
Anyway, it doesn't need to have cast argument at all since it already
casted
From: Namhyung Kim
The print format of s32 type was "ld" and it's casted to "long". So
it turned out to print 4294967295 for "-1" on 64-bit systems. Not
sure whether it worked well on 32-bit systems.
Anyway, it doesn't need to have cast argument at all since it already
casted using type
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The print format of s32 type was ld and it's casted to long. So
it turned out to print 4294967295 for -1 on 64-bit systems. Not
sure whether it worked well on 32-bit systems.
Anyway, it doesn't need to have cast argument at all since it already
casted
From: Namhyung Kim
The print format of s32 type was "ld" and it's casted to "long". So
it turned out to print 4294967295 for "-1" on 64-bit systems. Not
sure whether it worked well on 32-bit systems.
Anyway, it doesn't need to have cast argument at all since it already
casted using type
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The print format of s32 type was ld and it's casted to long. So
it turned out to print 4294967295 for -1 on 64-bit systems. Not
sure whether it worked well on 32-bit systems.
Anyway, it doesn't need to have cast argument at all since it already
casted
Hi Masami,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:16:09 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/11/27 23:39), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hi Masami,
>>
>> 2013-11-27 (수), 20:57 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu:
>>> (2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x", unsigned int)
(2013/11/27 23:39), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> 2013-11-27 (수), 20:57 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu:
>> (2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x", unsigned int)
>>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned int)
>>>
Hi Masami,
2013-11-27 (수), 20:57 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu:
> (2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x", unsigned int)
> > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned int)
> > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%lx", unsigned long)
> >
(2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x", unsigned int)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned int)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%lx", unsigned long)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%llx", unsigned long long)
>
(2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, %x, unsigned int)
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, %x, unsigned int)
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, %lx, unsigned long)
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, %llx, unsigned long long)
Hi Masami,
2013-11-27 (수), 20:57 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu:
(2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, %x, unsigned int)
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, %x, unsigned int)
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, %lx, unsigned long)
(2013/11/27 23:39), Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Masami,
2013-11-27 (수), 20:57 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu:
(2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, %x, unsigned int)
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, %x, unsigned int)
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, %lx,
Hi Masami,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:16:09 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/11/27 23:39), Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Masami,
2013-11-27 (수), 20:57 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu:
(2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
-DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, %x, unsigned int)
From: Namhyung Kim
The print format of s32 type was "ld" and it's casted to "long". So
it turned out to print 4294967295 for "-1" on 64-bit systems. Not
sure whether it worked well on 32-bit systems.
Anyway, it doesn't need to have cast argument at all since it already
casted using type
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The print format of s32 type was ld and it's casted to long. So
it turned out to print 4294967295 for -1 on 64-bit systems. Not
sure whether it worked well on 32-bit systems.
Anyway, it doesn't need to have cast argument at all since it already
casted
16 matches
Mail list logo