Re: [PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 13:08 +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote: > > I would really like to make these smaller. They are made for every > > system call, and I consider tracing to always be added overhead. I hate > > it when we waste more memory for tracing as very few people use it > > (compared to those

Re: [PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 13:08 +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote: I would really like to make these smaller. They are made for every system call, and I consider tracing to always be added overhead. I hate it when we waste more memory for tracing as very few people use it (compared to those that use

Re: [PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-21 Thread Jovi Zhang
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:53 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote: >> On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> > Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events. >> > >> > The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable >> > of

Re: [PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-21 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:53 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote: > On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events. > > > > The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable > > of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future

Re: [PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-21 Thread zhangwei(Jovi)
On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote: > Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events. > > The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable > of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches > allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since

Re: [PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-21 Thread zhangwei(Jovi)
On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events. The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since triggers are

Re: [PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-21 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:53 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote: On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events. The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches

Re: [PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-21 Thread Jovi Zhang
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:53 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote: On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events. The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable

[PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events. The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since triggers are built on top of SOFT_DISABLE. Because the

[PATCH 03/11] tracing: add soft disable for syscall events

2013-06-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events. The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since triggers are built on top of SOFT_DISABLE. Because the