On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:34:05PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> (I'm going to assume for now that you meant the whole patch series.)
Same from me:
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
On 06/08/16 12:29, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/07/16 22:09, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> From: "H. Peter Anvin"
>>>
>>> The CC_SET() and CC_OUT() macros can be used together to take
>>> advantage of the new __GCC_ASM_FLAG_OUTPUTS__ feature
On 06/07/16 22:09, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> From: "H. Peter Anvin"
>>
>> The CC_SET() and CC_OUT() macros can be used together to take
>> advantage of the new __GCC_ASM_FLAG_OUTPUTS__ feature in gcc 6+ while
>> remaining backwards compatibl
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin"
>
> The CC_SET() and CC_OUT() macros can be used together to take
> advantage of the new __GCC_ASM_FLAG_OUTPUTS__ feature in gcc 6+ while
> remaining backwards compatible. CC_SET() generates a SET instruction
> on old
From: "H. Peter Anvin"
The CC_SET() and CC_OUT() macros can be used together to take
advantage of the new __GCC_ASM_FLAG_OUTPUTS__ feature in gcc 6+ while
remaining backwards compatible. CC_SET() generates a SET instruction
on older compilers; CC_OUT() makes sure the output is received in the
co
5 matches
Mail list logo