On 03/24, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > I don't make up the names, but for other qcom sbc products the
> > bootloader is looking for sbc there to make sure it picks the right dtb
> > blob. So I guess this is _the_ qcom
On 03/24, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > I don't make up the names, but for other qcom sbc products the
> > bootloader is looking for sbc there to make sure it picks the right dtb
> > blob. So I guess this is _the_ qcom 8064 sbc? Definitely not
On Wed 23 Mar 18:48 PDT 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/23/2016 06:04 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
[..]
> >
> > Also, if I make a product based of
On Wed 23 Mar 18:48 PDT 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/23/2016 06:04 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
[..]
> >
> > Also, if I make a product based of this board, with some minor
> >
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I don't make up the names, but for other qcom sbc products the
> bootloader is looking for sbc there to make sure it picks the right dtb
> blob. So I guess this is _the_ qcom 8064 sbc? Definitely not _the_ 8064
> sbc
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I don't make up the names, but for other qcom sbc products the
> bootloader is looking for sbc there to make sure it picks the right dtb
> blob. So I guess this is _the_ qcom 8064 sbc? Definitely not _the_ 8064
> sbc though.
>
> If this
On Wednesday 23 March 2016 18:48:46 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>
> > This "sbc" isn't that just the abbreviation for "single board
> > computer"? I find it hard to believe this is _the_ 8064 sbc or the
> > only 8064 sbc.
>
> I don't make up the names, but for other qcom sbc products the
> bootloader
On Wednesday 23 March 2016 18:48:46 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>
> > This "sbc" isn't that just the abbreviation for "single board
> > computer"? I find it hard to believe this is _the_ 8064 sbc or the
> > only 8064 sbc.
>
> I don't make up the names, but for other qcom sbc products the
> bootloader
On 03/23/2016 06:04 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla
> wrote:
>>
>> On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
diff --git
On 03/23/2016 06:04 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla
> wrote:
>>
>> On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla
wrote:
>
>
> On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
>>>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla
wrote:
>
>
> On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
>>>
On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000..e96aab6
--- /dev/null
+++
On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000..e96aab6
--- /dev/null
+++
On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..e96aab6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..e96aab6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
This patch adds support to DragonBoard600 with basic serial ports.
DragonBoard600 is based on APQ8064.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
.../arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts | 36
This patch adds support to DragonBoard600 with basic serial ports.
DragonBoard600 is based on APQ8064.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
.../arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts | 36 ++
2 files
18 matches
Mail list logo