Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-10-01 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:58:22PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/01/2013 02:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:31:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >>> The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this

Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-10-01 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/01/2013 02:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:31:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this >>> field needs to be initialized explicitly. >> >>> static void __init

Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-10-01 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:31:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs > > to be initialized explicitly. > > > static void __init smdkv210_map_io(void) > > > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@

Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-10-01 Thread Stephen Warren
On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs > to be initialized explicitly. > static void __init smdkv210_map_io(void) > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static struct samsung_bl_drvdata samsung_dfl_bl_data > __initdata = { >

Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-10-01 Thread Stephen Warren
On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs to be initialized explicitly. static void __init smdkv210_map_io(void) @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static struct samsung_bl_drvdata samsung_dfl_bl_data __initdata = {

Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-10-01 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:31:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs to be initialized explicitly. static void __init smdkv210_map_io(void) @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static

Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-10-01 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/01/2013 02:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:31:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs to be initialized explicitly. static void __init

Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-10-01 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:58:22PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 10/01/2013 02:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:31:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field

[PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-09-23 Thread Thierry Reding
The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs to be initialized explicitly. Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding --- arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-h1940.c| 1 + arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 1 + arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c | 1 +

[PATCH 05/10] ARM: SAMSUNG: Initialize PWM backlight enable_gpio field

2013-09-23 Thread Thierry Reding
The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs to be initialized explicitly. Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding tred...@nvidia.com --- arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-h1940.c| 1 + arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 1 + arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c | 1 +