When mapping an IRQ, if a mapping already exists, then we simply return
the virtual IRQ number. However, we do not check that the type settings
for the existing mapping match those for the mapping that is about to be
created. It may be unlikely that the type settings would not match, but
check for
On 18/03/16 10:03, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 03/17/2016 08:18 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 17/03/16 14:19, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> When mapping an IRQ, if a mapping already exists, then we simply return
>>> the virtual IRQ number. However, we do not check that the type settings
>>> for the exi
On 03/17/2016 08:18 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 17/03/16 14:19, Jon Hunter wrote:
When mapping an IRQ, if a mapping already exists, then we simply return
the virtual IRQ number. However, we do not check that the type settings
for the existing mapping match those for the mapping that is about to be
On 17/03/16 14:19, Jon Hunter wrote:
> When mapping an IRQ, if a mapping already exists, then we simply return
> the virtual IRQ number. However, we do not check that the type settings
> for the existing mapping match those for the mapping that is about to be
> created. It may be unlikely that the
4 matches
Mail list logo
