Re: [PATCH 06/17] xen-blkfront: remove IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM which is now a no-op

2012-07-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:32:25PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > With the changes in the random tree, IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM is now a > no-op; interrupt randomness is now collected unconditionally in a very > low-overhead fashion; see commit 775f4b297b. The IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM > flag was scheduled to

Re: [PATCH 06/17] xen-blkfront: remove IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM which is now a no-op

2012-07-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:32:25PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: With the changes in the random tree, IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM is now a no-op; interrupt randomness is now collected unconditionally in a very low-overhead fashion; see commit 775f4b297b. The IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM flag was scheduled to be

[PATCH 06/17] xen-blkfront: remove IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM which is now a no-op

2012-07-17 Thread Theodore Ts'o
With the changes in the random tree, IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM is now a no-op; interrupt randomness is now collected unconditionally in a very low-overhead fashion; see commit 775f4b297b. The IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM flag was scheduled to be removed in 2009 on the feature-removal-schedule, so this patch is

[PATCH 06/17] xen-blkfront: remove IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM which is now a no-op

2012-07-17 Thread Theodore Ts'o
With the changes in the random tree, IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM is now a no-op; interrupt randomness is now collected unconditionally in a very low-overhead fashion; see commit 775f4b297b. The IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM flag was scheduled to be removed in 2009 on the feature-removal-schedule, so this patch is