Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-12 Thread Shawn Guo
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:19:47PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > You probably may need to change the patch title after merge. > clk: imx: fix pll clock parents Right, thanks for the reminding. Shawn

Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-12 Thread Shawn Guo
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:19:47PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > You probably may need to change the patch title after merge. > clk: imx: fix pll clock parents Right, thanks for the reminding. Shawn

Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-12 Thread Dong Aisheng
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:52:04PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:43:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > > pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock > > > since it's only valid when when pllx

Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-12 Thread Dong Aisheng
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:52:04PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:43:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > > pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock > > > since it's only valid when when pllx

Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-12 Thread Dong Aisheng
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:43:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock > > since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set. > > Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass

Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-12 Thread Dong Aisheng
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:43:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock > > since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set. > > Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass

Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-12 Thread Shawn Guo
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock > since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set. > Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass only. > > Instead, pllx parent should be fixed to osc according to >

Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-12 Thread Shawn Guo
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock > since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set. > Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass only. > > Instead, pllx parent should be fixed to osc according to >

[PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-08 Thread Dong Aisheng
pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set. Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass only. Instead, pllx parent should be fixed to osc according to reference manual. Other plls have the same issue. e.g. before fix, the

[PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

2016-06-08 Thread Dong Aisheng
pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set. Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass only. Instead, pllx parent should be fixed to osc according to reference manual. Other plls have the same issue. e.g. before fix, the