On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:27 AM Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 25. November 2018, 22:19:01 CET schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> > As done in the Rockchip vendor tree and also on other
> > "arm,armv7-timer" instances, the correct GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE mask
> > is 4 instead of 1.
>
> Nope. That value
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:27 AM Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 25. November 2018, 22:19:01 CET schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> > As done in the Rockchip vendor tree and also on other
> > "arm,armv7-timer" instances, the correct GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE mask
> > is 4 instead of 1.
>
> Nope. That value
Am Sonntag, 25. November 2018, 22:19:01 CET schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> As done in the Rockchip vendor tree and also on other
> "arm,armv7-timer" instances, the correct GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE mask
> is 4 instead of 1.
Nope. That value represents the number of cores in the system.
As the rv1108 only
Am Sonntag, 25. November 2018, 22:19:01 CET schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> As done in the Rockchip vendor tree and also on other
> "arm,armv7-timer" instances, the correct GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE mask
> is 4 instead of 1.
Nope. That value represents the number of cores in the system.
As the rv1108 only
As done in the Rockchip vendor tree and also on other
"arm,armv7-timer" instances, the correct GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE mask
is 4 instead of 1.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Fabio Berton
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1108.dtsi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
As done in the Rockchip vendor tree and also on other
"arm,armv7-timer" instances, the correct GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE mask
is 4 instead of 1.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Fabio Berton
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1108.dtsi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
6 matches
Mail list logo