On 07/24/2013 03:45 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:59:21PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
@@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ acpi_tb_install_table(acpi_physical_address address,
* fully mapped later (in verify table). In any case, we must
* unmap the header that was mapped above.
On 07/24/2013 03:45 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:59:21PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
@@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ acpi_tb_install_table(acpi_physical_address address,
* fully mapped later (in verify table). In any case, we must
* unmap the header that was mapped above.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:59:21PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ acpi_tb_install_table(acpi_physical_address address,
>* fully mapped later (in verify table). In any case, we must
>* unmap the header that was mapped above.
>*/
> + table_desc =
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:59:21PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
@@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ acpi_tb_install_table(acpi_physical_address address,
* fully mapped later (in verify table). In any case, we must
* unmap the header that was mapped above.
*/
+ table_desc =
Besides the phys addr of the acpi tables, it will be very convenient if
we also have the signature of each table in acpi_gbl_root_table_list at
early time. We can find SRAT easily by comparing the signature.
This patch alse record signature and some other info in
acpi_gbl_root_table_list at early
Besides the phys addr of the acpi tables, it will be very convenient if
we also have the signature of each table in acpi_gbl_root_table_list at
early time. We can find SRAT easily by comparing the signature.
This patch alse record signature and some other info in
acpi_gbl_root_table_list at early
6 matches
Mail list logo