Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-27 Thread Paul Turner
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 08/26/2013 08:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote: @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s tmp->parent = parent->parent;

Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-27 Thread Paul Turner
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Rik van Riel r...@surriel.com wrote: On 08/26/2013 08:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote: @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s tmp-parent = parent-parent;

Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-26 Thread Rik van Riel
On 08/26/2013 08:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote: >>> @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s >>> tmp->parent = parent->parent; >>> if (parent->parent) >>>

Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-26 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote: > > @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s > > tmp->parent = parent->parent; > > if (parent->parent) > > parent->parent->child =

Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-26 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote: @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s tmp-parent = parent-parent; if (parent-parent) parent-parent-child = tmp; +

Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-26 Thread Rik van Riel
On 08/26/2013 08:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote: @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s tmp-parent = parent-parent; if (parent-parent)

Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-24 Thread Paul Turner
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I found that on my wsm box I had a redundant domain: > > [0.949769] CPU0 attaching sched-domain: > [0.953765] domain 0: span 0,12 level SIBLING > [0.958335] groups: 0 (cpu_power = 587) 12 (cpu_power = 588) > [0.964548]

Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-24 Thread Paul Turner
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote: I found that on my wsm box I had a redundant domain: [0.949769] CPU0 attaching sched-domain: [0.953765] domain 0: span 0,12 level SIBLING [0.958335] groups: 0 (cpu_power = 587) 12 (cpu_power = 588) [

[PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-19 Thread Peter Zijlstra
I found that on my wsm box I had a redundant domain: [0.949769] CPU0 attaching sched-domain: [0.953765] domain 0: span 0,12 level SIBLING [0.958335] groups: 0 (cpu_power = 587) 12 (cpu_power = 588) [0.964548] domain 1: span 0-5,12-17 level MC [0.969206]groups: 0,12

[PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code

2013-08-19 Thread Peter Zijlstra
I found that on my wsm box I had a redundant domain: [0.949769] CPU0 attaching sched-domain: [0.953765] domain 0: span 0,12 level SIBLING [0.958335] groups: 0 (cpu_power = 587) 12 (cpu_power = 588) [0.964548] domain 1: span 0-5,12-17 level MC [0.969206]groups: 0,12