On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 21:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 May 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > @@ -97,8 +98,7 @@ bool xen_arch_need_swiotlb(struct device *dev,
> > >phys_addr_t phys,
> > >dma_addr_t dev_addr)
> > > {
> > > - unsigned
On Thu, 21 May 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
> > @@ -97,8 +98,7 @@ bool xen_arch_need_swiotlb(struct device *dev,
> >phys_addr_t phys,
> >dma_addr_t dev_addr)
> > {
> > - unsigned int xen_pfn = XEN_PFN_DOWN(phys);
> > - unsigned int bfn =
Hi,
On 21/05/2020 00:45, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
From: Stefano Stabellini
Add phys_to_dma/dma_to_phys calls to
xen_dma_sync_for_cpu, xen_dma_sync_for_device, and
xen_arch_need_swiotlb.
In xen_arch_need_swiotlb, take the opportunity to switch to the simpler
pfn_valid check we use everywhere
From: Stefano Stabellini
Add phys_to_dma/dma_to_phys calls to
xen_dma_sync_for_cpu, xen_dma_sync_for_device, and
xen_arch_need_swiotlb.
In xen_arch_need_swiotlb, take the opportunity to switch to the simpler
pfn_valid check we use everywhere else.
dma_cache_maint is fixed by the next patch.
4 matches
Mail list logo
