On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 08:02 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> It is not the comment that annoys people. Arnd was saying that the
> entire debug unit should not exist.
There is many per-subsystem debugging stuff in kernel. I do not see
_objective_ any reason to prohibit use have our own debugging stuff
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 14:33 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 22:18 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > If you feel that Linux needs rich debugging capabilities, then submit
> > a patch for that independent of UBI.
>
> I will fix the comment which annoys.
It is not the comment
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 22:18 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> If you feel that Linux needs rich debugging capabilities, then submit
> a patch for that independent of UBI.
I will fix the comment which annoys.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:18:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 17 February 2007 17:55, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * UBI debugging unit.
> > + *
> > + * UBI provides rich debugging capabilities which are implemented in
> > + * this unit.
>
> Stop right here. You
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:18:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 17 February 2007 17:55, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
+
+/**
+ * UBI debugging unit.
+ *
+ * UBI provides rich debugging capabilities which are implemented in
+ * this unit.
Stop right here. You should be doing
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 22:18 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
If you feel that Linux needs rich debugging capabilities, then submit
a patch for that independent of UBI.
I will fix the comment which annoys.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 14:33 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 22:18 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
If you feel that Linux needs rich debugging capabilities, then submit
a patch for that independent of UBI.
I will fix the comment which annoys.
It is not the comment that
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 08:02 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
It is not the comment that annoys people. Arnd was saying that the
entire debug unit should not exist.
There is many per-subsystem debugging stuff in kernel. I do not see
_objective_ any reason to prohibit use have our own debugging stuff in
On Saturday 17 February 2007 17:55, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> +
> +/**
> + * UBI debugging unit.
> + *
> + * UBI provides rich debugging capabilities which are implemented in
> + * this unit.
Stop right here. You should be doing one thing and do it right.
Since the point of your patches is to do
diff -auNrp tmp-from/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h tmp-to/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h
--- tmp-from/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ tmp-to/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h 2007-02-17 18:07:26.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) International Business
diff -auNrp tmp-from/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h tmp-to/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h
--- tmp-from/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ tmp-to/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h 2007-02-17 18:07:26.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) International Business
On Saturday 17 February 2007 17:55, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
+
+/**
+ * UBI debugging unit.
+ *
+ * UBI provides rich debugging capabilities which are implemented in
+ * this unit.
Stop right here. You should be doing one thing and do it right.
Since the point of your patches is to do volume
12 matches
Mail list logo
