On 10/22/19 2:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 4:07 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
@@ -319,10 +316,13 @@ static struct platform_device *sa11x0_devices[]
__initdata = {
static int __init sa1100_init(void)
{
+ struct resource wdt_res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x9000, 0x20);
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 4:07 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > @@ -319,10 +316,13 @@ static struct platform_device *sa11x0_devices[]
> > __initdata = {
> >
> > static int __init sa1100_init(void)
> > {
> > + struct resource wdt_res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x9000, 0x20);
> > pm_power_off =
On 10/18/19 8:41 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Rather than relying on machine specific headers to
pass down the reboot status and the register locations,
use resources and platform_data.
Aside from this, keep the changes to a minimum.
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck
Cc: Guenter Roeck
Cc:
Rather than relying on machine specific headers to
pass down the reboot status and the register locations,
use resources and platform_data.
Aside from this, keep the changes to a minimum.
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck
Cc: Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-watch...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
4 matches
Mail list logo